While the instructor made an effort to boost engagement through D2L discussions, the course could have been organized more effectively. He showed favoritism and offered little support to students who struggled. The material itself was valuable for those willing to dedicate time to review it, but his high expectations and lack of empathy made it difficult for many to succeed.

The instructor displays clear bias toward students who already excel. He offers little flexibility for those experiencing genuine difficulties, even when they share their circumstances. He rarely responds to emails and declines to support students who are striving earnestly despite significant obstacles.

While the instructor made an effort to boost engagement through D2L discussions, the course could have been organized more effectively. He showed favoritism and offered little support to students who struggled. The material itself was valuable for those willing to dedicate time to review it, but his high expectations and lack of empathy made it difficult for many to succeed.

The instructor displays clear bias toward students who already excel. He offers little flexibility for those experiencing genuine difficulties, even when they share their circumstances. He rarely responds to emails and declines to support students who are striving earnestly despite significant obstacles.